J. Phys. Chem. A, 104 (30), 7123 -7128, 2000. 10.1021/jp0007181 S1089-5639(00)00718-0
Web Release Date: July 11, 2000

Copyright © 2000 American Chemical Society

The Structures of Difluorodiisocyanatomethane, CF2((NCO)2: X-ray Crystallography, Gas Electron Diffraction, and Quantum Chemical Calculations

Jürgen Buschmann, Dieter Lentz, Peter Luger, Matthias Röttger, and Heinz Oberhammer*

Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie, Institut für Chemie-Anorganische und Analytische Chemie, Freie Universität Berlin, Fabeckstrasse 34-36, D-14195 Berlin, Germany, Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie, Institut für Chemie-Kristallographie, Freie Universität Berlin, Takustrasse 6, D-14195 Berlin, Germany, and Institut für Physikalische und Theoretische Chemie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 8, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany

Received: February 23, 2000

In Final Form: May 9, 2000

Abstract:

Difluorodiisocyanatomethane was prepared by reaction of difluoromalonyl chloride with trimethylsilyl azide. Its molecular structure was determined by X-ray crystallography at 141 K and by gas electron diffraction (GED), and quantum chemical calculations were performed at different levels of theory. Difluorodiisocyanatomethane crystallizes monoclinic, space group P21, a = 7.900(4), b = 4.890(3), c = 12.601(7) Å, = 102.280(10), V = 475.7(5) Å3, R1 = 0.0429, wR2 = 0.1179. The asymmetric unit consists of two molecules with C1 symmetry that are enantiomers. They differ only by the sign of related dihedral N-C-N=C angles, which describe the orientations of the two N=C=O groups: 1 = 107.2(2), 2 = - 4.8(2) for molecule A and 1 = -103.9(2), 2 = 8.9(2) for molecule B. The GED analysis results in a mixture of two conformers, 72(12)% possessing C1 symmetry (1 = 131(4), 2 = 43(5)) and 28(12)% possessing C2 symmetry (1 = 2 = 52(8)). Bond lengths and bond angles in the solid state and in the gas phase are very similar, but dihedral angles differ by almost 50. Quantum chemical calculations (HF, MP2, B3PW91, and B3LYP with different basis sets) reproduce the conformational composition, bond lengths, and bond angles very well. Predicted dihedral angles, however, depend strongly on the computational method and none of the calculations reproduces the experimental gas-phase values satisfactorily. They demonstrate, nevertheless, that the potential surface for internal rotation around the two C-N bonds is very flat.